Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. House Republican leaders began selling members on a tentative agreement to extend a payroll tax cut through 2012 as they seek to avoid the brinkmanship that hurt the party late last year.

Republicans met privately for more than an hour last night as House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp of Michigan described what he told reporters was a “framework” for a deal. The plan would extend the two- percentage-point payroll tax break for workers through Dec. 31 without covering the $94 billion cost, said Representative Kevin Brady of Texas and other lawmakers who attended the meeting.

It also would continue expanded unemployment benefits while gradually reducing the maximum number of weeks people can collect payments and avert a 27 percent cut in doctors’ Medicare reimbursements through the rest of this year, Brady and the other lawmakers said. Those would be paid for with reductions elsewhere in the budget.

A House-Senate conference committee appointed to resolve differences over the payroll plan hasn’t approved the deal. Representative Steve LaTourette, an Ohio Republican, said the plan received a “mixed reception” during the party’s meeting. With two weeks until the tax break expires, several Republicans said they might have to back the deal.

“It’s not great policy, but it’s the best of a bad world,” Representative Tom Price, a Georgia Republican, told reporters.

Support From Obama

President Barack Obama yesterday urged Congress to act quickly on the tax cut and unemployment insurance. With the economic recovery still fragile, lawmakers “shouldn’t hike taxes on working Americans,” he said.

The deal will be tough to support for some Republicans who have repeatedly said that the entire payroll package, with a 10-year price tag of as much as $160 billion, must be financed with other spending reductions.

The payroll tax cut issue has dogged Republicans since December, when the party initially rejected an extension and was blamed for almost allowing the break to expire. Under political pressure, House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, agreed to an extension through Feb. 29 to let negotiators work on a longer-term measure.

As those two months wind down, some Republicans said they want to move past the issue.

“The mood is to get it off the table,” said Florida Republican Dennis Ross. Fellow freshman Representative Bobby Schilling of Illinois added, “We need to just make this thing go away.”

Reducing Jobless Benefits

Brady, a member of the negotiating committee, said Republicans may be more willing to support this deal because it begins reducing jobless benefits. People in states with the highest rates of unemployment can now claim benefits for up to 99 weeks. The proposal discussed last night would gradually reduce that by more than 20 weeks, Brady said.

“Members are going to be encouraged by the unemployment reforms and the fact they’re fully paid for,” he said. “We achieved 90 percent of what we were seeking.”

Still, Representative Steve Chabot, an Ohio Republican, predicted the measure will need the support of some House Democrats because “you will have a lot of folks that will vote no.”

The plan will be paid for, in part, by allowing the sale of wireless spectrum and by using fees that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge to lenders, LaTourette said. Those elements haven’t encountered much opposition among lawmakers.

Federal Workers

Other proposals to cover the bill’s cost might cause partisan tension. Second-ranking House Democrat Steny Hoyer said federal workers may bear a “disproportionate share” of the cost because of a provision that would require them to pay more toward their pensions. Government workers are a major constituency in Hoyer’s Maryland district.

The deal wouldn’t extend miscellaneous tax breaks that expired at the end of the year, as Democrats had sought, according to a party aide familiar with the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity. It also doesn’t include a Republican-backed provision that would let companies write off the full cost of capital investments, said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican.

To be adopted and sent to the House and Senate floors for a vote, the agreement will need the backing of a majority of each chamber among the 20 lawmakers on the negotiating committee. House Democrats on the panel, including Representatives Sander Levin of Michigan and Allyson Schwartz of Pennsylvania, said late yesterday they were reviewing the proposal.

Camp has worked with Senate Democrats, including Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus of Montana, on the plan for several days.

Cantor said his chamber will consider the payroll package “as quickly as possible.”