Enforcing Trade Agreements

Jul 16, 2009

Today U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk gave a speech outlining a multi-pronged approach to the enforcement of trade agreements. We agree with Ambassador Kirk that trade agreements mean nothing if they aren’t enforced. The jobs of millions of American workers, farmers, and companies depend on access to foreign markets, and vigorous enforcement of trade agreements is critical to ensuring that access. Ambassador Kirk is right to use all the tools in his enforcement toolbox, starting with consultations, which have already helped his team settle some long-running disputes. The toolbox also needs to include appropriate use of U.S. trade laws and the dispute settlement procedures of the World Trade Organization.


But enforcement cuts both ways. The United States has not always lived up to its own commitments under trade agreements, as we’ve seen in the case of cross-border trucking with Mexico. Retaliatory tariffs have already cost thousands of American jobs. Keeping our own trade commitments gives us credibility when we call on others to keep their own. Finally, we hope that labor groups seeking enforcement of labor principles included in the very trade agreements they opposed will see how useful they can be — and support passage of the market-opening trade agreements with Panama, Colombia, and Korea.


CNBC talked to Kirk prior to his speech:


Subscribe today for Free Enterprise Updates

  • Latest business trends and best practices
  • News about legislation and regulation impacting business
  • Business how-to articles from industry experts
  • Commentary and interviews with newsmakers in business and politics